California MLS prepares for launch
Board appointed for Realtor group's subsidiary
By Glenn Roberts Jr., Friday, May 30, 2008.Bookmarking Sites
Board members for California MLS, a nonprofit, wholly owned subsidiary of the California Association of Realtors, will soon begin the process in selecting a vendor to operate a statewide property information database that could become the default MLS system for Realtors.
The CALMLS board, appointed this month by California Association of Realtors officers, has 17 members who are all real estate agents or brokers and is led by Mike Silvas, broker-owner of Napa-based Morgan Lane Inc.
Silvas, who had served on an MLS task force for the state Realtor group also served as a member of the board of directors for Real Estate Business Technologies, another subsidiary of the state Realtor association, said CALMLS represents a "historic opportunity" for industry participants.
"If we can do this right and we can do this to the benefit of everyone, it should be good for everyone in the state," he said.
The state Realtor group announced this month that 61 MLSs and local Realtor groups in the state have sent non-binding letters of intent to participate in the statewide MLS effort. There are 70 MLSs in the state.
Silvas said there are definitely some challenges remaining, as there are several regional MLS data-sharing and other collaborative efforts already under way in the state, and the statewide initiative has the potential to cause job losses if it replaces local MLSs.
"Anytime you do something new, people worry about it because it is new and different," he said. "Certainly there is the very real possibility that peoples' positions are going to be displaced."
He said he believes that the MLS collaborations that have risen up in the state were inspired by the effort to launch the statewide initiative, and that a challenge for the CALMLS board is in "trying to figure out a way to work with (these efforts), not around them."
Some Realtor associations are contemplating whether to offer a direct feed to the statewide MLS system rather than through an affiliated Realtor-operated MLS, Silvas said, which is "creating a little bit of consternation," and those types of decisions are up to individual associations and MLSs.
Under the statewide initiative approved in October by California Association of Realtors directors, local Realtor associations and MLSs can decide whether or not to use the statewide database as their primary MLS database or whether to continue to maintain a separate MLS system while also offering access to the statewide database.
"Once a vendor is selected, the implementation process will begin," according to a California Association of Realtors announcement this month.
Silvas said the goal is to launch the statewide database either in the last quarter of this year or the first quarter of 2009.
There will be uniform rules for the statewide MLS system, and brokers and sales agents will be allowed to access the statewide property system by joining a single participating Realtor association or MLS, the trade group also announced.
Multiple sets of MLS and association membership fees, rules and real estate forms have been a driver for regional and statewide MLS collaborative efforts.
Jean Powers, an associate broker for Windermere Welcome Home in Alameda, Calif., who is a member of the California Realtor group's board of directors, said she believes the statewide effort "is a positive move," though, "There are a lot of agents who think it's not."
Some agents, she said, fear that a statewide MLS system would allow agents from outside the area to sell property in their local territories, and there is also a fear within MLSs of job losses.
Powers said she doesn't believe this would be a big issue, as many agents would simply use the system to find agents to refer clients to in other parts of the state.
The system would, she said, assist brokers who own multiple offices by enabling them to join one MLS.
She noted that participation in the statewide database or MLS system is optional, though, "it will work best if everybody opts in."
The California Realtor group encourages members to visit http://mlsinput.car.org for more information about the statewide effort, and to send CALMLS comments at mlsinput@car.org.
The National Association of Realtors, meanwhile, is pursuing a national property information database for its members called the Library/Archive and formerly referred to as the Gateway and Real Estate Channel, though this effort is not envisioned as a national MLS system.
***
What's your opinion? Leave your comments below or send a letter to the editor.
All rights reserved. This article may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.

You must login or register to post a comment.
Submitted by Jeri Creson on May 30, 2008 - 7:47am.
We as an industry have long moved beyond the moment of controlling the flow of data in order to control our business. Data is in the public domain. We are in an age where we must learn to make our businesses about providing superior services and access portals to that data - easier, more user friendly approaches to handle information. Long gone are the days when we should worry about who gets to play in our backyard. We should simply concern ourselves about taking the best care of the customer before us, not worry about whether the agent next to us lives in our neighborhood.
We're in a global environment. It's good for us to behave as such. I applaud the CALMLS. Sign me up.
Submitted by Don MacKay on May 30, 2008 - 9:25am.
Canada have operated a nation wide public portal, access via MLS.ca, check it out, for many years, the name will be changed to REALTOR.ca but it will still deliver most all of the listings to the public from all the MLS systems that are members of Canadian Real Estate Association REA in a few clicks. Should it be operated by CREA no! Neither NAR nor CREA should be in the Real Estate, marketing business. Should a nationwide public portal for all listing be available, absolutely?
I’m amazed at the resistance in the USA about allowing the public to have easy, unconditional access via the web to all the listing available regardless of whom the listing Agent/Broker is.
Agents need not worry, with the ever increasing numbers of disclosures, rules, regulations they have become as important to the transaction as lawyers are to lawsuits.
The software is available now, why reinvent the wheel?
Submitted by Lenore & Alex Wilkas on May 30, 2008 - 10:12am.
As a Realtor in the trenches daily, I am really excited about this coming down the road. Northern CA is doing this now, but for some reason the East Bay opted out, providing a huge hole in the attempt. This, in my opinion, is short sighted for their agents and for the others within the MLS's attempting to do this.
I sure don't like having agents from areas far way from my community come in and list property. They don't understand how business is done on the SF Peninsula, and believe me, it is done differely with more details and up front visability for everyone involved in the transaction, (unlike other areas of the State), plus we use our own contract, not CAR's. They don't know this, or understand this ,and the transactions are generally sloppy for that reason.
The public wants MLS information in one place which is why they flock to Realtor.com, Trulia, Movoto and Redfin. I want it, too. It's silly that if my clients ask about something property related in another part of the State, that I have to go through convoluted ways to get the data.
My CAR dues are going somewhere for something and so are my local MLS dues, but I sure don't know where. Bravo for this project and I am anxious to see it come to fruitiion for myself and all of the other agents in California.
Lenore Wilkas
Prudential CA Fine Homes International
Read Our Blog @ www.SanMateoRealEstateNews.com
Submitted by Barry Noble on May 30, 2008 - 10:28am.
Here's to the ability to check any property at any time, anywhere in California. It will allow Realtors to give their best service to their clients; will allow them to better know what is going on in any of the State's market areas, at a glance, instead of trying to remember how to get into a small MLS system via guest accounts that change their entry codes monthly and they won't have to learn that MLS' very different system compared with their own or others. As primarily an Appraiser and also a broker/ Realtor it will be doubly useful to me.
Submitted by Jodi Summers on May 30, 2008 - 11:46am.
Yeahhhh! It will be great to have easy-to-access information for the greater L.A. area. As it exists now, the regionalization is definitely limiting the pool of buyers.
Jodi Summers
Sotheby’s International Realty, Santa Monica
jodi@jodisummers.com
listing websites
http://www.2542manchesterblvd.jodisummers.com/
http://www.2340manchesterblvd.jodisummers.com/
http://www.3619motorave.jodisummers.com/
http://www.3760motorave.jodisummers.com/
blogs +
http://www.SoCalInvestmentRealEstate.com
http://www.SoCalIndustrialRealEstateBlog.com
http://www.SoCalOfficeRealEstateBlog.com
http://www.SoCalGreenRealEstateBlog.com
http://www.SantaMonicaLandmarks.com
http://www.SantaMonicaPropertyBlog.com
**
"If the king loves music, there is little wrong in the land." -Mencius
Submitted by Kevin Seney on May 31, 2008 - 6:10am.
Aren't they still just creating another, although larger, regional MLS?
Why not USMLS or MLSUSA?
People do move from state to state.
Why create another stepping stone system, when in reality, property listings should be national or even global.
Kevin Seney
www.bugrealty.com