NAR reveals national property database details
'Library/Archive' is latest name for 'Gateway' plan
By Glenn Roberts Jr., Friday, May 16, 2008.Bookmarking Sites

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Leadership for the National Association of Realtors is "very committed" to a plan to create a massive national property database to serve as a resource for agents and brokers, the leader of the group spearheading the plan announced Thursday.
Gary Thomas, a Southern California RE/MAX broker who has led the advisory group, said during a Thursday session at the National Association of Realtors' annual midyear conference that there are plans to form an advisory board and launch a pilot project for the database.
The MLS Future Presidential Advisory Group was formed in 2006 to conceptualize a possible new form and function for the patchwork of multiple listing services that stretch across the country. The group's vision, and the shape and name of the project have morphed over time.
Once referred to as the Gateway and later called The Real Estate Channel, the project is now referred to as the Library/Archive.
Some industry participants have expressed worry that the project could displace MLSs or interfere with their role, though Thomas has said that the advisory group's plan is not to create an MLS.
"This is not an MLS -- it's not trying to be an MLS. This is a resource for agents. Look at it like a library ... overlaid with MLS data for those MLSs that want to participate," he said.
The advisory board for the project will be composed of brokers, MLS officials, Realtor association executives and volunteers, Thomas said. "Everybody will have input into this. We'll seek input -- we always have -- and we'll try to make this work for everybody."
A handout presented at the MLS Forum session where Thomas spoke on Thursday states that there "are a number of MLSs ... (that) wish to consider participating in the pilot project."
That message, by real estate consultant Ann Bailey, refers to a NAR white paper stating that the Library/Archive pilot project "will identify all major policies and procedures necessary to operationalize the system."
The white paper, posted on a blog site by David R. Phillips, CEO for the Charlottesville Area Association of Realtors in Virginia, proposes that the Library/Archive will compile information about individual properties, communities, local trends, regulations, "and other factors related to local real estate" into a single database that will allow Realtors "to provide broader, deeper and more timely and accurate information to their consumers."
The database, as proposed, would include information on most U.S. properties, and would be password-protected.
"Imagine what we can build together with MLSs and Realtors participating, along with augmentation from third-party data suppliers and other data-collection methodologies," the white paper states.
The system would include information on properties regardless of whether the properties have been involved in recent sales transactions, according to the paper.
NAR's board of directors has already approved a budget estimate of $3 million to form the database, and the paper suggests that the project should be implemented quickly. "We believe this aggressive action is needed now and is a critical component of our strategy to preserve the brokerage community's long-term consumer-relevant options."
While the advisory group had earlier considered limited consumer access to the database, the white paper states that the Library/Archive would be password-protected and not accessible by consumers.
Bailey's message about the Library/Archive project suggests that there is a need to determine whether the project could conflict with contractual relationships existing between MLSs and third-party vendors in local markets, and to determine the percentage of agents that already have access to a range of property information, such as data on new homes and rental properties, among other areas of study.
David Charron, president and CEO for Metropolitan Regional Information Systems Inc., the nation's largest MLS with about 60,000 members, said during a conference session later that day that there are fears about the possible course of the database project.
"This is an industry that constantly needs something to fear. Seldom do we collectively celebrate something."
He also said that he expects a national data repository is inevitable, and "whether or not it evolves into an MLS" remains to be seen. "I think making promises about what it may or may not be 10 years from now ... are probably foolhardy."
The Library/Archive project may serve as a lightning rod for additional data-sharing and collaborative efforts across markets, and that is a good thing, Charron said.
***
What's your opinion? Leave your comments below or send a letter to the editor. To contact the writer, click the byline at the top of the story.
All rights reserved. This article may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.

Add A Comment
You must login or register to post a comment.
Submitted by Jillayne Schlicke on May 16, 2008 - 2:07pm.
Sounds like NAR is trying to play catch up.
Zillow is already winning this game.
Submitted by Gregory Bain on May 16, 2008 - 3:55pm.
To me it would be a more important step for NAR to standardize the license requirements of agents who are forced to be members.
A national data base of homes makes no sense when each state does not recognize the license from the other state. What's the point?
The only thing standard in real estate is the HUD-1 form. And, that because the NAR had nothing to do with it. The problems of standardization in this business is beyond the grasp of the NAR. One example is the designation of Accredited Buyers Representatives, an ABR in Texas uses the same terms and language as an ABR in North Carolina but they mean something totally different to the agents and of course the consumer.
Anyway, isn't the NAR claiming now that all real estate is local?
The less the NAR does the better I like it. Kind of the way I like my government.
Gregory Bain, ABR, SRES
Realtor Associate
NJHomes@Ask4Greg.com
Submitted by Alice Cleveland on May 17, 2008 - 6:17am.
What would be the benefit? If I have a client moving to another state, I will refer them to a REALTORĀ® there. Why would I spend hours searaching, say, California when I live in Georgia and do not have a CA license? How could a data base this size be maintained as property is listed, expired, withdrawn, under contract, sold, etc., all day long in different time zones. Sounds like trying to build a huge ship and make it turn on a dime. Just ain't gonna work! I can't tell you how many times someone has checked on REALTOR.com for homes and get so excited, they have found something their agent did not find. Well, HELLO, it is because it has sold, expired, been withdrawn or whatever MONTHS before but still shows as active on REALTOR.com. Alice Cleveland, Karafotias Realty, Atlanta, Ga 404-936-3355 cell, Alice@AliceCleveland.com, www.AliceCleveland.com
Submitted by Jerry Hoffman on May 18, 2008 - 9:19pm.
There are a great many voyuers who will like looking in the windows of other markets. But, real estate is local - period. Local MLS systems should have a public portal ala HAR.com. This sounds like an unnecessary status symbol. Stop looking for ways to spend money on new committees and stick with the issues of the industry. Wouldn't it be nice if we did something to stop the MLS from becoming a public utility for the benefit of non-members......
As for Zillow (et al) - its like having Ray Charles score Dancing with the Stars. It does have some nice eye candy, but really.....
Submitted by Duke Lane on May 19, 2008 - 2:43pm.
Regional MLS-fed search systems would seem to make sense, especially in the Northeast where smaller states are served by multiple MLSes, or in border areas where agents might be licensed in more than one state simply due to proximity. In such cases, an agent might drive only a handful of miles before "outside their search area" without such a system.
This function might better be the purview of the local agencies that are affected by it and who must integrate data (and membership?) among a relatively few entities - many of which, incidentally, seem to be making excellent strides in that direction - rather than that of a single national organization interfacing with over 900 MLSes and attempting to normalize their content.
The utility of a "national MLS" seems highly limited to agents, and redundant to consumers who can easily utilize an existing service such as Realtor.com or any of the various newspaper sites, or NRT's own set of integrated regional search sites ... or Google when it decides to take over the real estate search market!
In the meanwhile, a member-centric organization is always best focusing its attention and its monies on things with the greatest benefit to the most members. It doesn't strike me that a Connecticut agent being able to find the latest listings in Idaho is what fills that bill.