Inman

Why agents should be classified based on education and experience

Rawpixel.com / Shutterstock.com

When will we look in the mirror? When will the public’s opinion of us as buffoons finally spur action from within? When will we stop calling ourselves professionals and actually take steps to be professionals?

If you are not fully invested, this is not your profession — this is a hobby. And your hobby continues to smother those of us who are true professional agents.

Disruption has been a $5 word over the past several years, and nothing has disrupted the real estate world like the internet. The fastidiously well-maintained and seemingly impervious walls of secrecy have been obliterated; previously highly classified MLS information spilled into the public domain along with information including demographics, schools, tax records and pretty much whatever anyone wants.

The genie is out of the bottle, and we are all better for it. Except for one thing: this agent thing. Why are there so many, and why are so many just so — bad?

This industry has to raise the entry and retention bar; a profession does not operate in this manner.

A profession does not have an insanely high percent of members who do not earn a living in the field, nor one without any type of apprenticeship, nor one with such a large percentage of members who never complete a transaction, nor one with so many who never make it to their second anniversary, nor one that just harbors members who are incapable of successfully operating in the current environment.

If this is a profession, why don’t we act like it and demand professionalism?

What if we took a cue from the appraisal industry? What if we set minimum standards for new and existing agents? Save the comments; it’s understood that there are still subpar appraisers, but there is no argument that raising the standards improved things. Why not three agent classes that reflect education and experience? For new agents:

Registered or Trainee

Licensed agent

Certified agent

In short, this does a few things:

Existing agents — the professional ones — have that real world experience, and it should be recognized. However, time in service does not mean experience and skill — closing deals and being active does.

Consider the same three-level format but leveling based on volume/gross commission income or number of transactions:

Will it be a challenge to do something like this? Absolutely, but the upside is huge. Public opinion will improve; the industry will shake off a massive amount of parasitic agents, and the industry as a whole will become smaller and more efficient. We are a bloated babbling blob right now.

All that said, let me introduce you to the 800-pound gorilla in the room, his name is agent fee. Our industry loves him because he — particularly when a young rookie — spends (wastes) lots of money.

Broker fees, board fees, marketing, MLS, signs, websites, pretend designations, leads, coaching — it’s no secret that fees make the real estate world go ’round. It’s also common knowledge that recruiting new agents is at least as much of a priority for brokers (and many agents) as actually selling real estate.

So the confounding conundrum is clear; why would the industry try to reign in agent fee when he is its centerpiece?

The answer is simple; though the industry has been forced to talk about its clown show reputation, talk will be it. Consider the cataclysmic real estate crash and aftermath; there was one segment that rose from the rubble completely unscathed.

One group simply brushed the dust off their shoulders, rinsed the grit from that pearly white smile and told the public “it’s a great time to buy or sell real estate.”

Hank Miller has been an active certified appraiser and associate broker since 1989.

Email Hank Miller.