Inman

Hire a pro to shoot listing photos, then put them in the right order

How not to shoot listings photos image via Shutterstock.

This summer, many of my colleagues, friends and even family members had either purchased a home or were actively searching for one. I decided to seize the moment and take this opportunity to document real, critical consumer feedback.

The foundation of the “visual Web” and real estate marketing has always been photography. I wanted to learn how consumers interact with real estate photography, so I developed a research project. The results of my study were quite interesting.

Before I started my research, I needed a baseline. I decided to take some time and examine the quality of photography in the real estate space.

As you can imagine, the quality of photography was inconsistent and, at times, pretty funny. I viewed dozens and dozens of photographs that had everything from Realtors reflecting in bathroom mirrors to oversaturated fake grass composited in Photoshop. Check out the Facebook page Bad MLS Photos to see what I mean.

To find out how consumers interact with real estate photography, I decided to start my research by conducting qualitative research. I conducted in-person and online interviews.

I asked each participant 10 questions. The questions addressed the home search process and how they interacted with photography. I recorded the in-person interviews and transcribed the data. My research data was entered into a spreadsheet and analyzed.

Qualitative versus quantitative

Let’s take a moment to clarify the difference between qualitative and quantitative research. Quantitative research is typically facilitated via statistical, mathematical or computational techniques. Unlike quantitative research, qualitative research is more intimate and is typically conducted in an interview setting. You can learn more about both approaches here.

Let’s take a look at my findings

While I was conducting my qualitative research and interviewing consumers, my colleague Ido Zucker, partner at booj (formerly Active Website), was conducting a usability test for me that tackled the quantitative aspect of my research. The usability study was conducted utilizing Tobii eye tracking technology. The Tobii computer is a super-cool, state-of-the-art eye-tracking platform used in a variety of research fields. I’d like to share the results of this data with you as well.

Usability study

Here’s a search results page from Hawaii-based brokerage Kahala Associates.

[Click fullscreen to enlarge]

Here’s another example. This time the homes represent a more rustic style. The page layout is the same.

[Click fullscreen to enlarge]

As I reported in my qualitative research, consumers want to see big, beautiful photography. Here’s another example from the usability study. This photograph is from an image gallery. It’s a nice picture.

[Click to enlarge]

However, the participants preferred this image.

[Click to enlarge]

So, how did I apply the data that I collected during my research? Here’s an example of a property (with notes) utilizing the feedback from my research project.

[Click to enlarge]

To recap my findings:

  1. Consumers start the home search online, or more specifically, on Google.
  2. Consumers utilize websites such Zillow and Trulia but circle back to a broker’s website to make contact.
  3. Photography is critical. Consumers want large, professionally shot photographs.
  4. Sequential order of the photos matters.

Please contact me if you have any questions or want to discuss my research in greater detail.

Tom Flanagan is the director of information technology at Residential Properties Ltd. in Providence, R.I. You can contact him at tflanagan@residentialproperties.com or @tflan on Twitter.