Clock ticking again on seller-funded down payments
HUD taking comments on FHA rule change until Aug. 15
By Inman News, Tuesday, June 17, 2008.Bookmarking Sites
Federal regulators on Monday renewed their efforts to ban seller-funded down-payment assistance on FHA-guaranteed loans, publishing a proposed rule and reopening the public comment period on the plan until Aug. 15.
The Department of Housing and Urban Development says allowing sellers or others with a financial stake in the sale of a home to fund down payments inflates home prices and triples the chance that a home will end up in foreclosure.
A federal district court judge in March blocked HUD from implementing a final rule banning the practice that was published in the Oct. 1 Federal Register, saying HUD had not fully explained why it was reversing course from past policies. Nehemiah Corp. of America and two other nonprofits that operate seller-funded down-payment-assistance programs sued HUD to block implementation of the rule (see story).
In Monday's Federal Register, HUD restated its previously proposed rule, but provided additional details on the rationale behind it.
Although HUD had previously argued that it could continue to allow seller-funded down-payment programs by introducing risk-based pricing, Congress has not acted to allow HUD to charge riskier borrowers higher rates. The FHA Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund now faces losses that would require taxpayer subsidies of $1.4 billion in fiscal year 2009, HUD said.
Loans involving seller-funded down-payment assistance made up more than 35 percent of all home purchase loans insured by FHA in fiscal year 2007, compared to less than 2 percent seven years earlier. Lifetime claim rates for the loans are above 28 percent, compared with 12 percent for all other high-loan-to-value FHA backed loans. It costs HUD six cents for every $1 of such loans it insures.
"It is not possible under current law to charge insurance premiums in an amount sufficient to cover this increased insurance claim risk, even if the maximum allowable insurance premiums were charged to all FHA-insured home buyers," HUD said in Monday's Federal Register.
Once the public comment period is closed, HUD will decide whether to publish a final rule. The final rule would go into effect 180 days it is published, barring another legal challenge by groups that facilitate seller-funded down-payment assistance.
***
What's your opinion? Leave your comments below or send a letter to the editor.
All rights reserved. This article may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.

You must login or register to post a comment.
Submitted by Bruce Hahn on June 17, 2008 - 2:27pm.
American Homeowners Grassroots Alliance
Although HUD's determination to prohibit downpayment assistance may seem odd in light of the fact that HUD totally ignored its regulatory responsibilities in allowing the mortgage meltdown, there is a certain consistency. The latter destroyed the housing market, and prohibiting downpayment assistance will help assure the continuation of the problem.
Submitted by Lonny Coffey on June 17, 2008 - 2:49pm.
The reality of HUD eliminating DPA programs is fewer people can buy in a market where we are loosing buyers ability to buy every day. The smart thing to do, oops I forgot we were talking about the Government here, is to allow 100% risk based loans to buyers who are properly educated to make their payments. With credit scoring out of control, the average guy not having any hope of entering the home buying arena more foreclosures are sure to come. VA has a 100% loan model that has worked forever, FHA could help but still playing politics.
Submitted by Jennifer Nelson on June 19, 2008 - 8:25am.
Instead of going back and forth about seller-funded downpayments to the buyer, what about seller-funded money going directly into the FHA Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund instead?