New group launches for independent listing agents

Former broker seeks non-Realtor members for AARSTEAM

Inman News

The National Association of Realtors has a Code of Ethics that its 1.3 million members agree to abide by. The Association of Associates Representing Sellers (AARSTEAM), a new membership group created by the CEO of a New York real estate brokerage company, offers an alternative called the "Oath of Actions."

Realtor-affiliated for-sale property information databases are known as multiple listing services, or MLSs, and millions of Realtor-listed properties are displayed at NAR-affiliated Realtor.com.

Members of AARSTEAM, as independent agents and non-Realtors who don't list properties on MLSs, post property information at the association's "PFS" ("properties for sale") search site. There are fewer than a dozen properties listed at that site, and the association's AARSTEAM.com site lists two association members -- both of them work at the AARS founder's brokerage company.

Russell Dickson, the CEO for NoSellerCost.com Inc. and founder of the for-profit AARSTEAM corporation, said he believes there must be an alternative to NAR for agents who specifically represent sellers. "AARSTEAM is a seller-oriented association for independent real estate brokers. There would be a conflict if you were a member of (NAR)," Dickson said, as he believes some NAR policies are not in the interest of sellers.

Specifically, he said disclosure by Realtor-affiliated MLSs about the number of days on market could be contrary to sellers' interests, and he said that buyer's agents should not be allowed to enter a seller's home via a lockbox without the presence of the seller's agent. Some contract language, he also said, may also work against the interests of sellers.

"This is not your grandfather's association," according to marketing materials for the new group. Members, dubbed AARSREPS, must pay an annual fee to participate in the association, the Web site states, and AARSREPS have a fiduciary duty to represent the seller's best interest "at all times of a real estate transaction" and agree to the "oath of actions."

That oath states that AARSTEAM members "shall not disclose a seller's days on market to any potential buyer at anytime," for example, and that members "shall not utilize any form of a lockbox or hidden key method to allow another individual (other than self) to view the seller's premise without your presence."

The days-on-market issue has been a divisive one for the industry, as some agents have attempted to remove a property from an MLS and then re-list the same property in order to reset the days-on-market counter and make it appear as though the property is newly listed.

And there is not a consensus among real estate search sites on whether to display or withhold days-on-market statistics.

Dickson said he believes there is opportunity for the new concept to grow, citing an estimated population of 1.7 million real estate licensees who are not affiliated with the National Association of Realtors.

An unaffiliated organization, the National Association of Exclusive Buyer Agents, was founded in 1995 as a nonprofit organization to serve agents and brokers who work exclusively with home buyers.

"Until recently, the real estate industry exclusively represented the seller," according to the NAEBA Web site, and the association seeks to provide an equal level of representation in real estate transactions for buyers.

Already, some industry groups offer designations for real estate professionals who have engaged in specialized training in working with either buyers or sellers. RealtyU, a real estate education and training company, for example, offers an Accredited Seller Representative designation, for example, and the Accredited Buyer Representative designation is offered through NAR's Real Estate Buyer's Agent Council.

Jon Boyd, a past president for the National Association of Exclusive Buyer Agents who works at Home Buyer's Agent of Ann Arbor, said he was surprised that there was no mention about dual agency in AARSTEAM's oath -- dual agency is a situation in which a single agent represents both a buyer and seller in the same transaction. Some states do not allow dual agency, as there are potential legal conflicts with such transactions.

Also, he said, "They advocate against using lockboxes, and in many markets that is vital to getting a home shown, particularly for relocating buyers. I don't see that as in the seller's best interest or in the buyer's best interest." Boyd said that it may not always be in the best interest of sellers to require that the seller's agent is present during every showing of a home.

Dickson said he had been a real estate broker for about eight years, and, "I resigned my license so I could concentrate on AARSTEAM."

Dickson had served as broker for NoSellerCost.com Inc., a company that claims on its Web site that it offers "full service" real estate services to sellers at a zero commission rate, and also offers advertising packages to post property information on a Web site.

When asked how the brokerage company makes money, Dickson said, "We don't get into specifics. We get that question asked every day. The competition hates it and our sellers love it." He said the company does not offer any cooperating compensation to brokers who bring a buyer into transactions.

***

Send tips or a Letter to the Editor to glenn@inman.com, or call (510) 658-9252, ext. 137.

You must login or register to post a comment.

 
Submitted by Leslie Tucker on March 5, 2008 - 3:38pm.

So you all charge a commission as the listing agent working only in the sellers best interest and you bring in your own buyers apparantely. n agent with a buyer for your listing is not going to bring their buyer without compensation, so you are always acting in a dual disclosed manner on all your listings. Am I right???

 
Submitted by on March 5, 2008 - 5:51pm.

It's a for profit company? Seems like a way to make more money at the expense of the clients.

Why would you want to hold information from buyers? Sounds like a good way to get sued.

Joe
Austin Realtor | Austin Real Estate | Austin Real Estate Blog

 
Submitted by Dean Gupta on March 5, 2008 - 8:48pm.

In our market in Minnesota, in early 1990s, all brokers used to exclusively represent the sellers agent or subagent. Even if you never met the seller, you were required to represent Sellers. Where as if you were working day in day our for your buyers you could not represent buyers. Due to this restriction, I left a major broker and decided to become an independent broker.

I have been thinking for a long time, that why a listing agent is required to negotiate for buyers broker fee from sellers? Buyer brokers should request their own share from the sellers. Should not that be the responsibility of the Buyer Brokers. You will see that how many buyer agent will disappear?

 
Submitted by Melissa Manford on March 9, 2008 - 2:08pm.

Such a one sided View. Does it really bother other agents that much, that Non MLS members will have a separate organization?

Some of the comments I notice don’t relate to the New Assoc. at all...

The first comment really shocked me! "No agent is going to bring their buyer without compensation". I did not think it was legal to be a buyer’s agent and choose when you will/won't represent your clients; based on who/how you are compensated. I am curious, if your client wants to see a property that will not compensate you, what do you do? A buyers broker agreement states: the Agreements with buyers must specifying how the buyer's broker is to be paid (by the seller or by the buyer himself). It gives both options. After all, this is a service industry and those agents who assist their clients needs beyond just sending listings, will be in more demand, by well-informed buyers more than happy to compensate you? Also, your question to Dual Agency; I didn’t read anywhere in the New Association about Not allowing Buyers agents. Your post doesn’t seem to be related to the new agency at all, but to the agents who are members of it…..An Association is separate from the members who belong to it. If your part of MLS, but you may work for ABC realty you are two separate companies!

Another post. "It's a for profit agency? Seems like a way to make money at the expense of the client". Yes, it does seem like The Association is a for-profit agency, because they charge membership fees to the MEMBERS... just like many Association do, including the Association you belong too. Your second comment makes me hope that U only represent “Buyers”, or you’re A LAW SUIT WAITING TO HAPPEN. "Why would you with-hold information from the Buyer, it’s a great way to get sued". If you represent the Seller isn't it true that you; shall not during or following the termination of professional relationship with their client use confidential information of clients to the disadvantage of clients. DOM is confidential; it is not to your Sellers Advantage. Nor is DOM a latent material defect, so it does not need to be Disclosed. Real Estate 101

Thankfully we live in the Greatest country in the world and people have the choice to be members or non members of different Associations, Political parties, hair color, cloths etc…..

 
Submitted by Eric Bramlett on May 20, 2008 - 7:17pm.

The notion that lockboxes are a bad idea is laughable. I don't understand how their system operates, and I don't think I care to learn.

Eric Bramlett
Austin Real Estate | Austin condos

 
Submitted by Alex Greb on June 8, 2008 - 5:23pm.

Not sure this will work. In this busy day and age. Lockboxes are a must. I can only imagine showing more then 10 homes and trying to coordinate everyone to be home.

 
Submitted by Alex Greb on June 8, 2008 - 5:23pm.

They need to least get the cheap code boxes from Homedepot.

Portland MLS

Advertise with Inman